Updated April 2026 | NAIC, J.D. Power, NerdWallet 2026
Telematics Car Insurance: 10 to 30% Savings With UBI Programs
Eight major UBI programs from the major carriers. Which programs only reward safe driving, which can penalise aggressive driving, and the privacy trade-off behind the discount.
The major UBI programs side-by-side
| Program | Carrier | Max discount | Can it raise rates? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | Progressive | 30% | Yes, up to ~10% increase |
| Drive Safe and Save | State Farm | 30% | No |
| Drivewise | Allstate | 25% | No |
| SmartRide | Nationwide | 40% | No |
| RightTrack | Liberty Mutual | 30% | Mostly no |
| DriveEasy | GEICO | 25% | Yes, varies by state |
| IntelliDrive | Travelers | 30% | No (rewards only) |
| SafePilot | USAA | 30% | No |
One-sided vs two-sided programs
One-sided programs (Drivewise, SmartRide, Drive Safe and Save, IntelliDrive, SafePilot, mostly RightTrack) only reward safe driving with discounts. Aggressive driving simply earns no discount; it does not increase the premium above the standard rate. These programs are low-risk to enroll in: worst case you stay at the standard rate, best case you save up to 30 to 40 percent.
Two-sided programs (Snapshot, DriveEasy in some states) can both reward and penalise. Safe drivers earn discounts up to 30 percent; aggressive drivers can see surcharges of 5 to 20 percent. The two-sided programs typically offer larger top-end discounts to safe drivers because the actuarial model can identify both ends of the distribution and price accordingly. Drivers who self-identify as careful should consider two-sided programs for the larger discount potential. Drivers unsure of their actual behaviour should stick with one-sided programs to avoid downside.
The privacy trade-off
All telematics programs collect continuous driving data: GPS location with time stamps, speed, accelerometer-derived braking and turning events, phone use indicators (in some programs), trip start and end times. Carriers state in privacy policies that data is used for underwriting only, not shared with marketers, not sold, and retained for a fixed period after policy end.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation and Consumer Reports have raised concerns about telematics data being subpoenaed in civil litigation (divorce cases, personal injury cases) where one party seeks to establish the other party's whereabouts at specific times. Some drivers find the collection itself uncomfortable regardless of stated privacy protections. The trade-off for the discount is personal: $20 to $60 per month savings vs continuous behavioural surveillance.
For drivers who decide the trade-off is acceptable, telematics is among the highest-yield single actions available. For drivers who decline telematics on principle, the standard policy options (good driver discount, deductible optimisation, bundle discount, carrier shopping) still offer meaningful savings without behavioural tracking.