Updated April 2026 | ValuePenguin 2026, FTC, III
Car Insurance by Credit Score: $156 Excellent vs $385 Poor
A 2.5x swing from the cheapest to most expensive credit tier. Banned in California, Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Michigan. The mechanics of insurance scoring, the carriers that price credit hardest, and how to move tiers.
The four-tier credit pricing curve
Carriers segment drivers into credit-based insurance score tiers, typically four to six. The exact cutoffs vary by carrier but the broad tiers correspond closely to standard FICO bands. Each tier carries a multiplier on the base premium.
The four states that ban credit-based scoring
California. Proposition 103, passed by California voters in 1988, established consumer protections in auto insurance rating including a prohibition on using credit scores. California carriers must price on driving record, miles driven annually, and years of driving experience as the three primary factors, with secondary factors permitted only if statistically valid. The California Department of Insurance regulates and approves all rate filings.
Hawaii. Hawaii Revised Statutes 431:10C-207 prohibits credit-based insurance scoring. Hawaii carriers must price on driving record and traditional non-credit factors.
Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Division of Insurance prohibits credit scoring in auto rating under longstanding regulation. Massachusetts has a heavily regulated rating system that has historically capped rate variation.
Michigan. Michigan banned credit-based insurance scoring as part of its 2019 auto insurance reform package (Public Act 21 of 2019). Michigan also has unique no-fault PIP rules.
In the four ban states, drivers with poor credit pay less for auto insurance than they would in a credit-scoring state with otherwise equivalent demographics. Drivers with excellent credit may pay slightly more in ban states because the credit-based discount they would receive in a scoring state is unavailable.
The interaction with other factors
Credit-based insurance score is one of several rating factors, not the sole driver of premium. State, age, vehicle, driving record, and claim history all matter. A driver with poor credit and a clean record in Vermont may pay less than a driver with excellent credit and a recent at-fault claim in Nevada. The credit factor is most visible when comparing two drivers identical in all other respects.
Practically, this means a credit improvement campaign should be one of several rate-improvement tactics, not the sole strategy. Combine credit improvement with telematics enrollment, deductible optimisation, carrier shopping at renewal, and discount stacking. The aggregate effect can be substantial: a driver who moves from fair credit to good credit, enrolls in telematics, raises their deductible from $500 to $1,000, and shops to a lighter-pricing carrier can drop their monthly premium by 30 to 50 percent in 12 to 18 months.